Swartbooi v road accident fund
SpletSwartbooi v Road Accident Fund. 21. as “shock suffe red by a person withou t necessar ily persona lly sustaini ng bodily injury. This kind of sho ck is caused when a thi rd party o … SpletOn 1 August 2008 the Road Accident Fund Amendment Act 19 of 2005 took effect, thereby amending section 17(1) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996, by introducing …
Swartbooi v road accident fund
Did you know?
SpletThe decision of Swartbooi v Road Accident Fund dealt with a claim by a secondary victim (that is, a person who was not directly involved in the motor vehicle accident) for emotional shock. http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPPHC/2015/817.html
SpletROAD ACCIDENT FUND v MTATI 2005 (6) SA 215 (SCA) Summary. Facts: The appellant raised a special plea against a claim brought by the respondent. The respondent claimed a large amount of money from the appellant, alleging that a motor vehicle collision between a negligent driver and the respondent’s pregnant wife caused their baby to be born mentally … SpletROAD ACCIDENT FUND . Fabricius J, The only issue before me in this claim against the Fund is the claim for loss of ... "The Fund shall, by notice in the Gazette, adjust the amounts referred to in subsection (14) (c) quarterly, in order to counter the effect of inflation. ... Compare Swartbooi v RAF 2013 (1) SA 30 (WCC) at 36 with reference to a
Splet000. In Nkhosi v Road Accident Fund 2009 6 QOD J 2-16 the plaintiff suffered chest injuries, rib fractures and fractures of third and fourth metacarpals of the right hand, concussion and laceration of the head. The plaintiff received R250 000 for general damages in 2009. The equivalent in 2014 is R325 000.In Torres v Road Accident Fund QOD A4-1 The SpletJacobs v Road Accident Fund Introduction [1] The plaintiff issued summons against the defendant, for loss of maintenance and support arising from the death of Wesley Stevens (the deceased) in a motor vehicle collision on 12 August 2015.
Splet08. avg. 2024 · ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT JUDGMENT KUBUSHI J INTRODUCTION [1] The plaintiff instituted action against the defendant for damages in respect of bodily injuries she sustained in a motor vehicle collision. The
SpletPage 2 of 10 matter because the principal place of business of the Road Accident Fund is located within the jurisdiction of the said Honourable Court. BACKGROUND 5. Mr Rapati was involved in a passenger motor vehicle accident on 9 July 2015 at approximately 21:30. 6. The Plaintiff was employed as a member of the South African National Defence Force … camping near nc zooSpletFoundations of South African Law: Assignment 1: Case Summary Facts There was a motor vehicle accident involving the plaintiff’s son, who is now deceased. The plaintiff was indigent and had no other means of support but from her son. The plaintiff sued the Road Accident Fund, whom she believed was liable for the loss of support from her child. RAF … fisap knowledge centerSplet17. maj 2024 · To furnish the plaintiff with an undertaking in terms of section 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996; 4. To pay to the plaintiff an amount of R1 200 000-00 general damages; 5. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff’s taxed costs or agreed costs on party and party High Court scale, including the following: fisap instructions 2020